mike huckabee president or bouncer? let's play "hardball." >> good evening. i'm chris matthews in washington. and we'll get to tonight's topics in just a minute. but first, i am proud that my wife kathleen has declared her candidacy for the u.s. congress today in the 8th district of maryland. as her husband, i will of course support her in this campaign, as i do in every aspect of our lives. in our years together, i have always had the strongest belief in her judgment and values. i will offer kathleen whatever help i can, including giving her any advice that might be useful. as a journalist, i also know how important it is to respect certain boundaries in my support for her both in my public role and here on msnbc. most of you know our show

doesn't typically cover congressional races, he will continue to fully disclose my relationship with her as part of msnbc's commitment to being transparent and fair in our coverage. i love kathleen and i am so proud of her and enthusiastically support her entering the call to public service. now, to mike huckabee. you would think a guy running for president would be out there scrounging for all the votes he can get. you know, put up the flag and hope people salute. not huckabee. he is right out front willing to say who he is considering one of us and the them he is willing to dismiss. here he is joking this year about transgendered people. >> i wish someone told me when i was in high school i could have felt like a woman when it came time to take showers in p.e. i'm pretty sure i would have found my feminine side and said coach, i think i'd rather shower with the girls today. you're laughing because it

sounds so ridiculous, doesn't it? >> so ridiculous. i'm joined right now by the director for the fast expanding "the huffington post," howard fineman. and former press secretary to president obama, robert gibbs, both are msnbc valued political analysts. robert, you've been out there hawking for votes, trying to get somebody to support a guy. why would a guy dismiss everybody who is a transgendered person, hundreds of thousands of people, perhaps, their families, their friends. they've already got problems with hispanics over immigration. they've got problems, i think they should have more with african americans and older people, especially over the voter id laws and things like that. i could go on. they keep making lists of people they don't consider one of us. why are they doing that? >> i think for huckabee, huckabee is a niche candidate. he is going to be a niche candidate. and he is not going expand his role. i think if any republican is going to be successful in 2016, and the rnc themselves identified this right after the 2012 race, they've got to expand their own electorate. 90% of the votes for president

that mitt romney got in 2012 were from white voters. the problem for the republican party is that white voters comprise a smaller percentage of the electorate than they ever had. it will be a smaller percentage in 2016. it will be smaller than that in 2020. and the only hope that they have is somebody who can expand the current electorate of people that is voting for republicans. >> explain how that locker room joke expands any electorate. >> well, that isn't. and my guess is that somewhat shortly after the iowa caucuses draw to a conclusion, so too will the mike huckabee campaign. even if he were to repeat a win in iowa, he already showed that he doesn't have the capacity to build on that with an electorate, even in his own party and put together enough votes to become the nominee. the only hope that i think republicans have is in a marco rubio or a jeb bush, somebody who they think can hopefully speak to a broader audience of

potential voters. >> howard, you and i have grown up in a country that has evolved. especially on identity issues, orientation issues. we have learned the right words. orientation is where you tend to have a sexual interest in another gender. and identity is what you see yourself as. in fact, i learned that from my wife in fact, at work you learn these things. we all try to teach ourselves. this cover of "vanity fair" this month. obviously graydon carter thinks a lot of people are interested. they're not in there to make fun of the guy. >> yes there is tremendous social change, demographic change as robert was saying, advances in science, all of which the republicans' most visible people seem to be rejecting. this is a disaster for the -- >> but these are voters. >> yes. i know they're voters. that's the whole point. in the effort -- in the effort to get a microniche, it isn't just a niche, it's a niche of a

niche there are several candidates focusing on the evangelical vote in iowa. and actually, mike huckabee, having once been the sort of user friendly evangelical guy in past electoral runs, or he has been the sort of nice guy nonjudgmental evangelical, now he is running to the right of rick santorum who is the ultimate judgmental one last time. the problem for republicans is this. social change, demographic change, and science. >> okay. >> all three of which the republicans seem to be on the wrong side of. >> take a look. this isn't looking for a fight. on gay marriage, the 2012 republican platform stated we reaffirm our support for a constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. we applaud the citizens of the majority of states which have enshrined in their constitutions the traditional concept of marriage, and we support the campaigns under way in several other states to do so. so this one man, one woman thing follows up four years before

that it was a man and a woman. i think it is something to do with the lds church, something to do with romney running. why did they have to specify their marriage defined as one man and one woman? who is arguing? i mean, utah got into the union by agreeing on getting rid of polygamy a long time ago. why are they argue about these weird things in the republican platform? my question to you. and making fun of these people. >> again, a good question. and the supreme court may go along way towards settling some of what the platform has to reflect in 2016. >> yeah. >> but, again, i think the only way -- the only way you can appeal to a broader set of people and to win that election is to open up the number of people that you're actually talking to. i mean, i think again, hispanic voters. >> i will say this. one of the things that hurts republicans in this cause are just issues as well. and beyond what you've talked about. we found in 2012 the most

important issue to hispanic voters was actually health care. and if republicans aren't speaking on -- >> i heard that. >> if they're not speaking on health care, they're missing the opportunity. remember, when george bush ran for president, one of his first speeches in 1999 was on a federal role for education that was a big, big play to hispanic voters. >> it's also true that immigration was a kind of gateway issue. yes, health care, but they won't even listen to you on health care unless you were right with hispanic community on immigration. which is another big problem for the republicans. >> i want to get to that right now. i'm joined by former new york governor george pataki, who has announced he is running for president in 2016. governor, i've always liked you and i hope you come on the show a lot more than tonight. >> well, it depends on what happens tonight, chris. i'd like to. >> well, we'll see. >> i know i'm surrounded by 3-1, that's about fair odds, i think. >> 3-1.

howard is independent. ron may argue and maybe with me. anybody can argue with me. i thought you showed some cojones going after huckabee in his old -- i would call it old fart i would call it attack on people who are transgendered the other day in the locker room you. ah that as something that offended you personally and politically. why didn't you take a shot at huckabee for that joke of his? >> he meant it in humor. but i don't think it was very good humor. i think we have to respect the dignity of people when they make deeply personal decisions, even if it's a decision that i might not agree with. >> what do you think about the republican party? i mean rudy giuliani, your colleague was pretty clear. i can't get the nomination, so why bother? i'm pro-choice, even though i'm against abortion personally and morally, i guess. he made it clear he was for the rights of people to choose an abortion. he is for same-sex marriage. and this basically knocks me out of the business. that your view of the party?

>> you know, i don't think that's the case. i've been out there now for about eight months in iowa and new hampshire, south carolina, around the country. and the only people who ask me questions about something like abortion is the press. the american people are concerned about security. they're very worried about isis and the lone wolf attacks and our failure to protect us from those radical islamic attacks abroad and here. they're concerned about an economy that is not growing the way it should. the fact people don't have jobs that pay enough, there are a great many issues out there that are of tremendous concern to the american people that i think right now are in the forefront of what they're thinking about. >> but if you look at the issues that are going to be decided by the supreme court this summer -- obamacare certainly, the aca. you look at the fact of same-sex marriage, these are all going to be right on the front pages. >> sure. >> the house will not pass the senate bipartisan bill allowing people a path to citizenship. these aren't issues that i'm cooking up. if you went out there saying you were pro-choice, saying you're for same-sex, saying you're for

a path to citizenship, you would have a problem in iowa you. say you won't. but i think you would. >> chris, i'm not saying that. first of all, i agree that i hope the supreme court does throw out obamacare. if it doesn't, should it be repealed. there are far better ways to provide access to health care to those who didn't have health insurance without dictating that every single american the type and kind and cost of health care policy they have to have. and i think on issues like security, that is in the forefront of the american people's minds today. we just had the battle over the patriot act. and i think we made a tremendous mistake in not reauthorizing nsa's ability to monitor phone calls of those who they have a court order because they suspect of terrorism and who they're in touch with. so yes, the supreme court will be deciding issues. i think marriage has always been a state issue, should continue to be a state issue. but when the supreme court makes a decision, that's the constitution, that's the law. we have to abide by it. >> let me ask you about the republican party. when you and i grew up, the

republican party was robust in the northeast. almost every northeast state north of west virginia had a republican senator or two. now of the top, we went over it today. of the top 13 start, every state east of ohio, north of north carolina, there is three republican senators in those 13 states. what happened to your party in the northeast? >> you know, i think actually earlier, when you were talking with the others, they talked about how the republicans have not reached beyond their base vote. and i think that is true. i think we have to be more aggressive in reaching auto minorities and reaching out to young people and reaching out to moderates and conservative democrats. i did that in new york state. in fact, i got a plurality of the latino vote when i was running for reelection of governor. i didn't have to change my philosophy. i didn't have to change my policy. but the republicans have to show that we are a broad party. and our policies work not just for our traditional voters, but are most important for those who need a job, who are concerned

about security, who want access to health care that isn't provided by government mandate. and i think we can do that. i think we can win, not just in traditional republican states, but in the northeast as well. >> well, good luck, governor, and thank you. and thank you. i hope you come back on again. you decided this interview was up to your standards. >> thank you, chris. and good luck to your wife. you know. i admire anyone who gets into this game. >> so do i. thank you so much, howard. and thank you so much robert gibbs for joining us. coming up, hillary clinton is fighting back against republicans who are making it harder for people to vote. she is going after voter exclusion, repression, the whole thing. her campaign is launching a cross-country legal battle to roll back the new voter id laws and the rest of it in key battleground states like wisconsin, ohio and virginia. it could make the difference between her winning the white house and not. plus, president obama has been trashed by his right wing critics for being anti-israeli. so what do we make of his comment that he is the, quote, closest thing to a jew that has ever sat in the oval office? is he the first jewish president

like clinton was the first black president? we'll see. interesting topic. interesting topic. and frightening new details from boston where authorities say two men were plotting to behead, behead police officers. this is scary stuff. finally, the "hardball" tactic, the muscle that big labor is use right now against fellow democrats. this fight over trade is getting bloody. this is "hardball," the place for politics. how do you get to the top of your game? give it everything you've got and leave those sticky sunscreens behind. new neutrogena cooldry sport. powerful protection designed to feel good. micromesh technology lets sweat pass through and evaporate so skin stays comfortable, while clinically proven protection keeps going strong. don't get stuck with a sticky sunscreen. stay protected and comfortable with every move. new cooldry sport. neutrogena. don't just visit new york. visit tripadvisor new york.

tripadvisor not only has millions of real traveler's reviews and opinions, but checks hundreds of websites, so people can get the best hotel prices. to plan, compare & book the perfect trip, visit tripadvisor.com today. add another democrat to the 2016 presidential field. former rhode island senator and governor lincoln chafee declared his candidacy today. in what can only be considered an extreme long shot bid. chafee was a republican when he served in the u.s. senate, and he was elected governor of rhode island as an independent before becoming a democrat two years ago. he was the only republican to vote against authorizing the war in iraq, and he is making that vote and hillary clinton's support for the war as the centerpiece of his campaign. and we'll be right back.

progressive insurance here and i'm a box who thrives on the unexpected. ha-ha! shall we dine? [ chuckle ] you wouldn't expect an insurance company to show you their rates and their competitors' rates but that's precisely what we do. going up! nope, coming down. and if you switch to progressive today you could save an average of over 500 bucks. stop it. so call me today at the number below. or is it above? dismount! oh, and he sticks the landing! so when my husband started getting better dental checkups than me i decided to go pro... with crest pro-health advanced. my mouth is getting healthier. my teeth are getting stronger. this crest toothpaste is superior in five areas. great checkup.

legislators in north carolina have pushed through a bill that reads like the greatest hits of voter suppression. restricted early voting, no more same-day registration or extending voting hours to accommodate long lines. stricter photo id requirements that disqualify those issue by colleges. >> welcome back to "hardball" that is former secretary of state hillary clinton of course, talking about the battle to get to the ballot box. elections are now being decided by the most narrow of margins, of course, and there is an active effort out there to try to tip the scales by restricting who gets to vote. it's a multiprong effort by some governors and legislatures pushing for stricter id requirements and shorter voting hours. here is dallas resident deandre carter who says he did everything right but still couldn't get his vote to count back in 2014. >> i came up to the lexington library right across the street from my house, did the provisional ballot, completed

out everything correctly, turned it in to the proper person. and then like maybe a week later after the election was over, i did not -- it told me that i was not able to vote and my vote didn't count. >> well, that's a profound story. joining right now is marc elias, a voting rights attorney and counsel to the hillary clinton campaign. marc, thanks for joining us. educate us. talk about this. you filed a suit along with other voting rights groups to try to stop the voting restricting access. in wisconsin, you provide this specific example. anita johnson is a 70-year-old african american resident of milwaukee. she has taken individuals from church to early weekend voting, but she no longer can do so because of the elimination of weekend early voting. that sounds like me souls to the polls it's called. people have always enjoyed getting up for church and then going and registering. it's a tribute and i think a celebration of democracy. some people don't like it. explain what is going on.

>> chris, i think you have put your finger on exactly what the problem is, which is whatever republican legislators are trying to do, with regard to election administration, they shouldn't be making it harder for people to vote. in wisconsin, as you mentioned, they cut back on the number of early days to vote, the time of day one can provide early vote, and they banned early vote on the weekends. now, why would you do that? what reason would the state of wisconsin have to say that people can't vote after work or people can't vote on a weekend other than to simply make it harder for someone to vote and therefore less likely to do so? why would wisconsin say that high schools can no longer be a place that young people who are registering for the first time can turn in their voter registration forms, so that they get registered to vote? what possible reason is there to do that other than to make it harder for young people to vote? and that's really the problem that we have, chris. >> it's like narrowing the strike zone to help the batter.

>> yeah. >> i know exactly what is going on. anyway, there are three critical states, purple states that could go either way where voter restrictions could make a difference in 2016. the gop legislature in the commonwealth of virginia want morse restrictive voter id requirements for absentee voters. scott walker, a very likely gop presidential candidate is reducing the window for early voting and wants tougher id requirements as well. in north carolina, which went for obama the first time, the gop wants more id restrictions and to eliminate the ability to register to vote on the same day. so that pattern, it is coordinated, marc? is this under the rnc? it always seems to be republicans doing it. >> yeah, so i don't know whether it's coordinated -- who it's coordinated by. but clearly there is a playbook that we are seeing play out in state after state after state. you left off your list ohio, which, despite the fact that we had in 2004 and 2008 and 2012 an epidemic of long lines.

you remember those images. >> sure. >> of the kerry campaign in 2004. you remember those students waiting in line for hours and hours amount. you saw that in 2008 and 2012. well, what did ohio do? again, they said that during early vote period, there can only be one location in a county. noble county has 8,000 citizens or voters, and franklin county has 800,000. there is only going to be one place in the county. why would you do that other than to make it harder to vote? >> marc elias, i got a tough question for you. was that vote counted in ohio in 2004 an honest call? was that an honest count? >> look, i think that attend of the day, the gap between president bush and john kerry was wider than the ballots that were left to be uncounted. ohio has a history of a large volume of provisional ballots that don't get counted. and that gap was too large. but i want to say this. it's not just the ballots that

don't get counted. it's the person who waits online for eight hours who leaves. it's the person who can't get a day off from work and never shows up. and so when you take the collective changes that we see the republicans making, that make it harder to register, harder to vote, and harder to get the vote counted. remember, provisional balloting, part of the problem is the voter has voted, but their vote doesn't count. when you take all of those three together we have a real problem. >> okay. last question. what do you think -- what do you know hillary will say tomorrow down in houston on these points? >> i don't know exactly what the secretary is going to say. you mentioned i'm the general counsel of her campaign. i also represent a number of national democratic organizations and lots of other democrats. i didn't bring these lawsuits on behalf of her campaign. i brought them on behalf of the groups that were interested in these cases. >> okay. >> and we're going to keep plowing forward. >> good luck with your cause. i love your cause. i think it's really important to this country in a nonpartisan way. i don't think anybody should have a hard time voting. voting should be a delight. should it be something you're

proud of and it's not impossible to do. anyway, thank you marc elias for the cause you're in. >> thank you. >> joining me right now is sherrilynn ifill, president of the legal defense fund. i look at place where pennsylvania where republican leaders openly brag about how they play this game. they see the court is generally against this kind of hanky-panky or shenanigans, and still it's an uphill battle to keep fighting about this kind of effort to restrict the vote. >> it absolutely. chris you were talking about marc elias about the purple states we all focus on when we talk about national elections. i'm a civil rights lawyer. i'm not a lawyer for the democratic party. the places where we have brought cases challenging, for example, voter id are, you know, states that are not the purple states. it's in texas where we litigated and won our voter id case last year. it's now in the court of appeals. south carolina in 2012. alabama, the place of shelby county, we litigated the shelby county case. we believe that this is an issue

about citizenship and about democratic participation, not necessarily about the outcome of a presidential election. and what we sometimes forget, chris, but i know that you know really well, local politics is critically important, especially in the south. it's the county commission races, it's the water district, it's the constable races, it's the justice of the peace, it's the local elected judges, it's those leaders that have real control over the lives african americans in small towns and communities throughout the south. and we shouldn't forget when we just look at the presidential elections and the swing states that just as much damage can be done by voter suppression at the local level in states that are really not in play in terms of the presidential election. >> i'm getting a word that secretary clinton tomorrow is going the call for a national standard of 20 days of early voting across the country. each say of course sets its own rules, election rules. do you think that's going to help, a standard? >> i think it's going help to have her saying it. it certainly would help to visit happen. but it's going to help to have her saying it. i think americans instinctively

feel, as you said, that vote shotgun be easier. should it be a joy, a delight i think you called it. >> i love voting. >> all these efforts to keep people from voting, it's anti-democratic, and if you even take the race lens off it, it goes to the fundamental essence of citizenship in this country. that's how we express who we are as citizens in the most powerful way is by voting. so these efforts are so cynical. they're so anti-democratic. and when you layer the racial piece on it, they're so pernicious. this is an issue. and that's why secretary clinton is speaking about it. i think she recognizes that there are two issues that african american voters are going to be focused on this year, 2015 and 2016. and if you're not talking about these two issues, you're not talking to african american voters. one is the issue of policing reform. one is policing reform that she talked about a couple of weeks ago, and the other is voting. >> sure. and i think one of the powerful groups in this country, african american republicans, it's not a large group, but if they were to blow the whistle and say we're not staying in this party as long as you stop our people from voting, that would make noise. and they would probably stop doing it under that kind of pressure.

anyways, thank you so much, sherrilynn ifill. thank you for joining us. up next, president obama says he is the closest to a jew that has ever been in the president. this is "hardball," the place for politics. when a moment spontaneously turns romantic why pause to take a pill? and why stop what you're doing to find a bathroom? cialis for daily use, is the only daily tablet approved to treat erectile dysfunction so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. plus cialis treats the frustrating urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision or any symptoms of an allergic reaction

stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use. insurance coverage has expanded nationally and you may now be covered. contact your health plan for the latest information.

welcome back to "hardball." well, president obama gave an interview to israeli tv this week in an effort to sell a nuclear deal with iran. it was a little counter-lobbying, if you will, to prime minister bibi netanyahu's huge push here in the united states to oppose the deal. the interviewer voiced his skepticism to a solution of a two-state solution. here it is. >> i think when he spoke right before the election, he was fairly unequivocal in saying that it wouldn't happen during his prime ministership. i think subsequently his statements have suggested that there is the possibility of a

palestinian state. but it has so many caveats, so many conditions that it is not realistic to think that those conditions would be met any time in the near future. >> right. >> and so the danger here is that israel as a whole loses credibility. >> well, it's comments from a former senior adviser to president obama that are getting a lot of attention right now. today, in fact. in a separate interview with israeli tv, david axelrod paraphrased what he recalled the president once telling him. quote, you know, i think i am the closest thing to a jew that has ever sat in this office. for people to say i am anti-israel or even anti-semitic, it hurts. critics have questioned that president obama could think he is the closest thing to a jew to ever hold the office. but does he have a point? jeremy ben-ami is the president of j street, a group that calls

itself pro-israel and pro-peace, which i believe it is. it's very tricky for anybody outside the group to talk about being inside the group. what do you think he means? >> i think he has broken up educationally and then in work around a group of very intellectual jewish liberals who shared his commitment to civil rights and equal rights and working for those who have less and need more. and that's what he viewed to be the jewish ethic. and he saw it in school, he saw it in his law firm, he saw it in everything that he did. i think he considers himself in a sense to be an honorary member of the tribe in that sense. >> i know exactly what he means. i think he means in terms of literary tastes, political tastes, lifestyle decisions, values. he says, you know, i keep noticing that i pretty much agree with these folks i've been hanging around with on all that

stadium. in fact all of it expect i didn't come from where they came from. the idea, this is where it gets hot. the idea of a two-state solution to the israeli-palestinian conflict has been bipartisan, we've all known for decades that could change in 2016. a number of republican candidates have stated they're opposed. even jeb bush, who says he supports it as a concept has expressed doubt it's possible. his spokesman said both sides must be represented by leaders who have the ability to uphold the promise made at the negotiating table, something the palestinian people do not have right now. israel is right to be skeptical of the palestinian leadership's ability to deliver. his fellow republicans go much further. here they are. >> do you continue to support a two-state solution? >> i don't think the conditions exist for that today. i mean, that's the ideal outcome. but the conditions for a two-state solution at this moment do not exist. do. >> you think israel should dismantle -- >> no. the bottom line is that is legitimately israeli country. and they have a right to do within their country just like

we have a right to do with in our country delicious is no real legitimate two-state solution to be had. it's a wonderful political concept. but having two different governments, one of whom doesn't even really acknowledge the existence of the other one trying to govern the same piece of real estate is utterly unrealistic. >> says a sovereign nation. i trust the leaders of israel to decide whether they want to adopt a one-state solution or a two-state solution. what i'm saying is we should trust israel to make that determination. >> meanwhile, ben carson, dr. ben carson said i don't have any problem with the palestinians having a state, but does it need to be within the confines of israeli territory? is that necessary, or can you sort of slip that area down into egypt? [ laughter ] i don't know what to say about dr. carson. he is a smart man. he is talking about creating a palestinian plate in some other place, in egypt. these people, it's either high pander or it's high ignorance.

you're the expert. what are they going to do with all the arab people that live in the territories? what are they going to do with them? >> there is 12 million people between the jordan river and the mediterranean sea. half of them are jewish and half of them aren't. what are you going to go the other half? >> to formally legally, do all the pencil work you want, and they're still with you. >> the question is can israel survive as a democracy and be the national homeland of the jewish people if you don't have two states? the pro-israel position is to be for two states, to question two states. you lose either israel's democracy or you lose it -- >> that's an old debate. i was over there when i got out of the peace corps in '71. it's a conundrum. these people that make these blithe statements, i think they're pandering to millions of evangelical voters and a couple of very pro-israeli right wing guys with some money. everybody knows what is going on here. >> they're not pandering to the jewish voter. >> no. >> 80% of the jewish voter support a two-state solution. >> when you get to israel, you're going to have a great

argument over there. only in the republican party is the argument over with. it's a ridiculous bunch of people. thank you, jeremy ben-ami. good luck with your organization, trying hard for peace. up next, a grim reminder. you're watching "hardball," the place for politics.

is there such a thing as a sure thing in business? some say buy gold. others say buy soybeans. i say, buy comcast business internet. unlike internet providers that slow down when traffic picks up, you get speed you can rely on. it's a safe bet. like a gold-plated soybean. reliably fast internet starts at $69.95 a month. comcast business. built for business.

i'm milissa rehberger. according to government authorities, rahim was planning a terrorist attack that would specifically target men in uniform, policemen. the plot included beheading them, beheading policemen. one of rahim's associates, david wright was arrested and charged in federal court today and charged with conspiracy. phone surveillance, a key element which is relevant given the ongoing debate these days about government surveillance in the nsa. anyway, over the weekend, rand paul led an effort in the senate to temporarily halt the government's ability to collect new phone records under the patriot act. yesterday the senate approved legislation to restart the operations in a deal that keeps phone records in the hands of phone companies, at least until

they're usable. anyway, the roundtable tonight, april ryan, for american urban radio networks. sean sullivan and heidi przybyla is a political reporter with bloomberg. this is a story only in the last hour before the program got wind of. these are african american guys, but the overlay or rather the base story here is about ethnicity. it's about conversion to islam and radicalization coming on its heels. and then this focus of going after police officers, april. >> well, you know, i mean targeting them for beheading. >> this is what we're hearing now. before then people were wondering if this was baltimore. that's not there at all. the baltimore piece is gone. but what this does, when we talk about this surveillance, the national security piece, it kind of puts a spotlight on what the president is saying, this is needed. and, you know, we worry about civil liberties and things of that nature. but what would have happened if we did not have this? and it also shines a light on

the fact that we are getting this right. we got it right in this instance with this young man who was talking -- well, he and another person who could have been lone wolfs in the name of isis. >> yeah, i know. shawn, this is unbelievable. because these lone wolfs are people that are self-starters. they're like entrepreneurs of hell. they decide i'm going to go kill some people. i can convert myself. i can convert over the internet. i can go home and night and watch some stuff and well, this is what i want to do. it's probably people who aren't too happy with their lives. but how does the government find out who those people are? >> i think a case like, this coming at a time when the surveillance debate is under the national spotlight, it turns something that is a hypothetical into a tangible. >> remember, rand paul said this weekend some of my critics are hoping there will be something going wrong and then i'll be -- i'm sorry, i'll blame them -- >> then they'll blame me. >> we're already seeing some congressional republicans come out and spotlight this case as to say, look, this is an instance that shows why we need these authorities.

it will be interesting in the coming days to see how many more people do this, and also who pushes back and says look, it's not the fact that we need these authorities that is going to help us stop prosecuting these cases. >> all politics is local, and that begins with yo yourself. most people look out for themselves. 61% of the american people, six out of ten, heidi, would like to see surveillance. i don't think they know about the nuance whether the phone company keeps the records or the nsa. they want people under surveillance. >> this is a case where the nuance is very important, chris. even though this is a fresh story, we're already finding out that the type of surveillance that was being conducted to intercept this guy in boston was not the bulk data program that was just expired by congress. it was a more specific targeted surveillance program which is still in effect and was never under the threat of being rolled back by congress. that said, it is certainly going to play into this broader narrative at a time when you the whole country very worried about the threat of terrorist attacks on our soil. >> as i mentioned on sunday,

senator rand paul accused his critics of wanting there to be an attack so they could rub it in his face. here is paul saying that. >> the people who argue that the world will end and we will be overrun by jihadists tonight are trying to use fear. they want to take just a little bit of your liberty, but they get it by making you afraid. they want you to fear and give up your liberty. people here in town think i'm making a huge mistake. some of them i think secretly want there to be an attack on the united states so they can blame it on me. they'll be the first to point fingers and say oh, yeah, it's all your fault. we never should have given up on this great program. >> well, senator paul later walked back his comments about his critics hoping for an attack in the u.s., saying the heat of the battle got the better of him. here is a great question. what are we more afraid of? always afraid of something, checking under your bed, locking the doors at night. we more afraid of isis penetrating into the country and getting a lot of recruits so it's a fairly normal occurrence that somebody attacks you or the

government coming after you? personally -- well, i'm going ask you all. are you more worried about the big government or big bad isis coming? >> i'm worried about being protected. >> isis? >> yeah. and i'm thinking back to 2001, 3,000 people were killed. >> i know. >> i think a majority of the american people are more scared about the terrorist threat. we've seen that in polls. >> absolutely. >> when we find out who committed the crime of 9/11, you mentioned, and we saw stuff, we saw mohamed atta, the leader, we saw him getting his money at the atm. we saw him going into some local store to buy some stuff, my god, i don't know what they had, everything on the guy, all day, all on tape. we realized that we are being watched. and when we had the boston bombing, we realized the surveillance cameras were all over the place. so technologically, we have a lot of capability to watch people. do we want to be watched? heidi? >> we're seeing at the same time we have a lot of these terrorist attacks on our own soil being plotted that were also getting a

lot more information about the extent of that surveillance that is going on. i think as with everything, it's a question of balance and getting the information out to the public. for example, letting the public know that is two independent commissions that found that we have never intercepted a terrorist whose proven to be a terrorist with the bulk data collection. >> with the meta data, who called who. watching "good wife," it seems like the investigator on the show always comes up with some sort of surveillance tape that cracks the case. anyway, the roundtable is staying with us. up next, big labor is playing it rough. they're using muscle, i think they will admit to scare democrats vetoing for the free trade deal, the tpa. this is "hardball," the place for politics.

house republicans have a new strategy in their never ending investigation into benghazi. according to politico, they're threatening to withhold funding from the state department until officials speed up their responses to document requests. the house appropriations committee has proposed 2016's spending bill withhold 15% of the department's budget, quote, until requirements related to proper management of freedom of information act and electronic communications are met. anyway, a state department spokesman says cutting funding would be counterproductive and would only slow down the ability to meet those document requests. we'll be right back.

fight has moved from the house to the senate. the president is making a decision. despite the republican majority, they're going to need a significant number of democratic votes over there. the debate is getting nasty, organized labor has vowed to pressure votes against the president. some of the house is voting no. this ad is running against a supporter of fast track. including shipping your job overseas.

>> he's supporting fast track. we need your congressman to fight for your job not his job. >> politico reported last week, a call that went out to represent scott peterson, vote yes on fast track authority and the trans pacific partnership and spend a million dollars to knock them out in next year's primary, if he managed to win that primary, drop another million against him in the general election. one democrat on the fence, cedric richmond much new orleans says he's turned off by this. the more trump and others start to talk, the more i lean the other way. you're following this close. this is coming down to a couple votes it seems next week.

>> this is a very small handful of democrats we're talking about, and the aflcio is going nuts on them, they're running ads, they have pulled all their money from everything else and put it toward beating up on these democrats, which is really irritating, that's the word the third ranking democrat uses, really irritating democrats, because it's taking money from specifically a lot of the congressional backed caucus members who need it, and it's also compromising potentially these seats in helping the republicans. >> are they doing this tough guy act? are they going to lose this fight or they want revenge for losing it? are they going to pass it, they still want to scare people? >> all of the above. they want to show that they have the power, they want to use their muscle literally labor is showing they want to use their muscle. they've done the same thing with nafta with bill clinton. they were calling many congressional leaders to include the congress a.m. black caucus to say, if you vote for nafta, you will not --

>> guess who's for this -- >> bill clinton when he was with nafta, he made it a point to pick up the phone and personally invite congressional leaders over, so they wouldn't, made the case. >> is obama doing that? >> no, he season the. he is not bringing people over. >> you are right, i talked to members of nafta, clinton had a full on war room. there was a pay to play atmosphere. part of this is also, they are running scared that their vote will be called and the election will come around, what are they going to do? are they going to campaign against these vulnerable democrats to elect republicans who are going to vote to bust unions and vote for right to work laws? so that's why these democrats are a little bit i think not

necessarily taking back -- >> i think obama may need to take a page out of the clinton book, if he's so close, the way he wants it, he may need to bring them over and faulk to them. the personal touch always reaches -- >> this hits a familiar cord with the president, he's not warm and fuzzy, he doesn't bring them into his heart and soul. >> this is a criticism we've heard over and over again. when you look at this issue, you see how sensitive this is in the democratic party. look at hillary clinton, the way she's navigated this, she's not backing obama. >> i don't need you when i'm right. >> thank you, april rion. thank you, they love my sense of humor. >> thank you, when we return, let me finish with the latest shenanigans by the republican party as they try to keep democratic voters from the polls. you're watching hardball, the place for politics.

♪ (lightning strike) ♪ (kiss) ♪ lead your heroes in the hit mobile game download heroes charge now!

the conference call. the ultimate arena for business. hour after hour

of diving deep, touching base, and putting ducks in rows. the only problem with conference calls: eventually they have to end. unless you have the comcast business voiceedge mobile app. it lets you switch seamlessly from your desk phone to your mobile with no interruptions. i've never felt so alive. get the future of phone and the phones are free. comcast business. built for business. we finish tonight with this, the republican party is out to win the 2016 by a strategy of putting the most votes they, the republicans permit to vote. instead of letting the people decide who to vote for, the politicians decide who they led to vote in the first place. they select the voters instead of the other way around. the sheer brazenness of this move is one thing we can all agree on.

seeing the changes on the way, the rise of the minorities in the american population, the rising number of single people. the changing attitudes of younger people the big thinkers in the republican party is to make it harder for certain groups to vote. let's look at who the gop brain trusts like to see on elect day. people who don't have driver's licenses. young people away from home and college. people who tend to vote for democratic candidates, making it harder for these people to vote is daylight robbery for the people in state capitols, relentless in finding ways to better their chances in the next election. the failure by democrats and others not to blow the whistle on these shenanigans which is exactly what they are. that's hardball for now, thanks for being with us. all in with chris hayes starts right now. tonight on all in. >> if it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to shut that whole thing down.

>> the 2016 republican field has its first todd aiken moment. why democrats are pouncing on scott walker. the call for a special prosecutor to investigate jeb bush's not quite a campaign campaign. a new democrat joins the field and we have the first interview, new details on an alleged terror attack thwarted in boston. horrifying numbers out this week from some of america's biggest cities. >> debunking the so called baltimore effect when all in starts right now. the republican party just had its first todd aiken moment of the campaign. scott walker announced he intends to sign a 20 week abortion ban now moving through the state legislature even if that bill makes no exceptions for pregnancies resulting in rape or incest.